|Posted by ruth.bednar on October 5, 2017 at 8:55 AM||comments (5)|
International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology
Oct 04, 2017, 07:18 ET
October is Dental Hygiene Month, but not all dentists will be touting the alleged benefits of fluoride. In fact, the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT) is using this month to raise awareness of the health risks associated with fluoride. This is especially timely because of recent news about a study linking fluoride exposure in utero with lower IQs.
The IAOMT is an organization of over 800 dentists, physicians, and research professionals in more than 14 countries, and the non-profit organization has been dedicated to its mission of protecting public health since it was founded in 1984. Since that time, the group has continually collected, examined, and reviewed studies and research articles about fluoride and other dental materials and practices.
"IAOMT and its members have been independently studying the toxicity of fluoride for decades," Matthew Young, DDS, President of the IAOMT, explains. "For dentistry, as an ethical profession, it is imperative to uphold the concepts of 'do no harm.' Fluoride has traditionally been seen as a panacea for dental disease without the knowledge of its inherent harm to the human body. We need to seek less toxic alternatives and work to improve human health with the safest approach."
|Posted by ruth.bednar on October 1, 2017 at 9:45 AM||comments (0)|
BY WHITNEY WEBB MPN NEWS
Sept. 23, 2017
For decades, many groups have fought against the inclusion of fluoride in publicly supplied water, arguing that the risks of mass fluoride consumption outweigh the purported benefits. Now, a new study published in Environmental Health Perspectives has added to the scientific literature that suggests that fluoride negatively impacts human intelligence, especially in children and infants.
The study, surprisingly, was widely reported in the U.S. mainstream media despite the fact that its findings contradict the government’s official position regarding the safety of fluoride.
The study examined nearly 300 sets of mothers and children living in Mexico and tested the children’s cognitive development twice over a 12 year period. A drop in scores on intelligence tests was observed for every 0.5 milligram-per-liter increase in fluoride exposure beyond 0.8 milligrams per liter found in maternal urine. While researchers found a potential connection to prenatal fluoride exposure, they found no significant influence of fluoride exposure on brain development once a child was born.
SEE FULL ARTICLE BELOW:
|Posted by ruth.bednar on September 30, 2017 at 10:35 AM||comments (0)|
Liesa Cianchino wants legal opinion on whether fluoride in tap water violates Charter
By Michael Smee, CBC News Posted: Sep 28, 2017
Liesa Cianchino sued the region three years ago, alleging that by fluoridating drinking water, the region is medicating the public without permission.
That violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, her suit says, as well as the province's Safe Drinking Water Act.
SEE FULL DETAILS BELOW:
|Posted by ruth.bednar on September 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM||comments (0)|
Published Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:01AM EDT
Staff writer - CTV NEWS
HIGHER LEVELS OF FLUORIDE IN URINE LINKED TO LOWER IQ SCORES CHILDREN
For years, many communities have added fluoride to drinking water to help reduce cavities. But a new study that has found a link between fluoride levels in pregnant women and lower intelligence in their children may provide further ammunition for those who are calling that practice into question.
In the first study of its kind, investigators at the University of Toronto, McGill, the Harvard School of Public Health, and other institutions have found a link between fluoride in the urine of pregnant women and lower measures of intelligence in children.
In the study released Tuesday in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, the researchers say they looked at 287 pairs of mothers and children in Mexico City at multiple stages of neurodevelopment. The study recruited pregnant women from 1994 to 2005, taking urine samples from the mothers during pregnancy and from their children between six and 12 years of age to assess their exposures to fluoride.
They then analyzed how fluoride in the pregnant mothers’ urine related to measures of intelligence. Those measures included the children’s verbal abilities at age four, as well as their perceptual performance, memory, and motor abilities. They were tested again for the same things between the ages of six and 12.
The researchers found a statistically significant connection between high levels of fluoride in the mothers when they were pregnant and lower scores on these intelligence measures. There was no link between the children’s own urinary fluoride levels and their test scores.
Dr. Howard Hu, the study’s lead investigator, and a professor of environmental health, epidemiology and global health at U of T’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health, says the fact that the fluoride levels in the mothers was most predictive of the drop in test scores may be due to the fact that the brains of babies develop so rapidly while they are in utero.
“This is consistent with a growing appreciation in environmental health that the growing fetal nervous system is more sensitive to exposures than a developed nervous system,” he told CTVNews.ca by phone from Sydney.
Tap water in many communities in Canada has been fluoridated for decades, in a bid to prevent cavities and improve bone health. But in recent years, research has begun to emerge suggesting that fluoride may be a neurotoxin.
“Back when they started that study, no one was worried about fluoride,” Dr. Hu says.
But he says a seminal 2007 book by the U.S. National Research Council of the National Academies described the link between the mineral and neurodevelopment.
Dr. Hu says some research has suggested the fluoride may interfere with cell messenger neurotransmitters. Studies on mice suggest it can accumulate in the hippocampus, an area of the brain important to learning and memory.
Dr. Hu notes those studies tested fluoride at much higher doses than humans would receive in fluoridated water. But he says those studies “open the door” to seeing fluoride as a neurotoxicant.
“The levels of exposure are higher. But there is now a rationale for expecting that it may also be toxic at lower levels,” he said.
The researchers adjusted their analyses for other factors that might have impacted the children’s neurodevelopment, such as the children’ birthweight, their gestational age, the mothers’ smoking history, their IQ, lead exposure, and more, but the link they found held.
“There’s always the potential that fluoride really is the proxy of some other real actor that’s playing a role. But I can’t imagine what that would be,” Dr. Hu said.
“We tested for all the things we could think of that could act on neurodevelopment. But we haven’t found anything else that was a potential confounder.”
Dr. Hu and his colleagues acknowledge that fluoridated water and toothpaste have both substantially reduced the incidence of cavities and should be acknowledged “as a public health success story.”
But they say that more research is needed on the potential adverse effects of fluoride, particularly in pregnant women and children.
“We emphasize that this is just one study. It’s a rigorous study but it’s just one study,” Dr. Hu said.
|Posted by ruth.bednar on September 8, 2017 at 9:40 PM||comments (0)|
A WARNING! FROM THE DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA TO RESIDENTS
Inserted with last month’s water bill, from the District of Muskoka, was a bright pink letter, warning residents of Door-to-Door Solicitors selling water filters. This warning letter was not signed or dated, and goes on to reassure us that “District water is held to the highest standards.”
As far as their “highest standards” statement, many health professionals and independent scientists would disagree. The addition of controversial harmful fluoridation chemicals which have nothing to do with drinking water quality or potability, continue to be added to Gravenhurst, Bracebridge, Bala, Port Carling, and MacTier. The impure chemical used for water fluoridation is an industrial grade by-product of the fertilizer industry, hydrofluorosilicic acid, containing many other carcinogens, and arsenic is one of them. Since when is the addition of arsenic to drinking water safe at any level, as well as fluoride?
This heated controversy has spurred neighboring towns Huntsville, Baysville, Barrie, Orillia, Parry Sound, and hundreds of other Canadian towns to either end or never initiate the addition of these fluoridation chemicals to community drinking water. Also, 97% of western Europe has rejected water fluoridation
The largest state legislature in the U.S. recently passed a bill mandating infant fluoride warnings on all water bills in fluoridated communities. On March 15, 2012, the New Hampshire House of Representatives voted 253-23 in favor of the bill.
The warning states:
"Your public water supply is fluoridated. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, if your child under the age of 6 months is exclusively consuming infant formula reconstituted with fluoridated water, there may be an increased chance of dental fluorosis. Consult your child's health care provider for more information."
At the very least, if the District of Muskoka is concerned about our health, then they should also include warnings, on our Water Bills, of the dangers of ingesting fluoridation chemicals.
Remember, swallowing fluoride exposes every tissue in your body to both a drug and a toxic substance, damaging soft tissues (brain, kidneys, and endocrine system), as well as teeth (dental fluorosis and bones (skeletal fluorosis). Substantiated proof of toxic fluoride overdose, is apparent in the 41% of dental fluorosis seen in adolescents, a condition in which tooth enamel becomes discolored and mottled resulting in badly damaged teeth, an increase of over 400% from the rates found 60 years ago. (CDC 2010)
A baby being fed formula reconstituted with fluoridated tap water receives approximately 175 times more fluoride than a breast-fed infant.
So, District of Muskoka, where are the fluoridation warnings on our water bill?
Ruth Bednar, R.H.N., R.N.C.P., R.O.H.P.
|Posted by ruth.bednar on June 27, 2017 at 10:35 AM||comments (0)|
(Natural News) Fluoride Action Network (FAN) filed a pivotal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the North District of California against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a rebuttal to the government agency’s denial of a petition that the non-government organization had issued under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) which asked for a ban in water fluoridation.
In a statement, FAN’s attorney and adviser, Michael Connett, expressed the organization’s advocacy of preventing people around the country from experiencing the harmful effects of fluoridated water, saying, “This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act. And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ – meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”
FAN, along with the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, Food and Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, and Moms Against Fluoridation, filed a petition on Nov. 22, 2016 which asked the EPA to ban the inclusion of fluoridating chemicals in drinking water under the provisions set in the TSCA.
Despite the organizations’ presentation of a 2,500-page scientific paper on the dangers of water flouridation to human and animal health, EPA has denied the petition.
Associated health risks of fluoridated water
Around 43 studies have illustrated the connection of fluoride ingestion with a reduction in IQ. FAN presented 180 other studies, with the same conclusion, to the EPA. One such study from the Harvard School of Public Health in 2012 stated: “Children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas.”
Incidentally, even the EPA itself has come to the same conclusion. According to EPA former senior scientist William Hirzy, Ph.D., who specialized in risk assessment and published a risk analysis in the journal Fluoride in 2016: “The significance of this peer reviewed risk analysis is that it indicates there may be no actual safe level of exposure to fluoride.”
Fluoridated water is harmful not only to neurological health, but to physical health as well. Dominic Smith, a 41-year old man, died after ingesting around 1.2 grams of sodium fluoride mixed into the water at Hopper Bay, Alaska on May 23, 1992. Studies show that a mere 200 milligrams can cause the death of a small child.
Governments have been practicing the habit of adding fluoride to water in the belief that the substance could prevent tooth decay and cavities. However, it was found that ingesting fluoride — in water, toothpaste, or in dietary prescription supplements like tablets or drops — can actually have a reverse effect. Exposure to fluoride over a long period of time can lead to dental fluorosis, which causes discoloration and breakage in the teeth’s enamel.
When taking into consideration the usage of fluoridated toothpaste or water, assess whether you can become a likely candidate for the negative effects of fluoride by looking at factors such as hygiene, diet, or history of tooth decay in the family. Follow more news on fluoride at Fluoride.news.
|Posted by ruth.bednar on June 3, 2017 at 11:05 AM||comments (0)|
By: Tyler Kula, Sarnia Observer 29-May-2017 −
Council chambers at Sarnia city hall was bustling with talk about water fluoridation Monday, where a packed house listened as two doctors presented the pros and cons.
“At a baseline, the overwhelming majority of evidence is in favour of continuing water fluoridation,” said Dr. Sudit Ranade, Lambton County’s medical officer of health
Ranade said water fluoridation is an effective way to guard against tooth decay, provided it’s regulated properly.
The practice is backed by the World Health Organization, Centres for Disease Control and many other reputable bodies.
Its benefit in reducing tooth decay is especially poignant among children, he said, noting the data generally needs further clarification.
Advocates also argue having fluoride in water means it’s available for lower-income portions of the population who might not have access otherwise.
But fluoride is in toothpaste and a host of other things, meaning it can build up and causes fluorosis – mottling – in teeth, said Dr. Hardy Limeback, former head of preventative dentistry at the University of Toronto .
One in 10 children in Canada has some degree of fluorosis, he said, noting he’s researched the impact of fluoride in water for decades.
Applied topically, fluoride has benefits, he said.
Ingested, it’s a different story.
“Once it gets in your cells, it’s like a bomb goes off,” he said, noting a study he conducted found it lowers bone strength.
Several studies also show it affects brain chemistry and lowers intelligent quotient, he said, when it builds up beyond the recommended level.
That happens more with people who consume more water, like athletes, kidney dialysis patients and babies on infant formula, he said
“It’s my opinion, based on the research we did … it can cause bodily harm,” he said.
“It does not provide the dental benefits as claimed and is not cost effective at all.”
In terms of cost, he said, it’s basically a wash in terms of preventing cavities and fixing fluorosis.
Sarnia last tackled the issue of water fluoridation in 2013, voting 5-4 to take it out of the water.
But Sarnia is part of the Lambton Area Water Supply System (LAWSS) and has continued with fluoridated water since because most other member municipalities with the utility voted to continue with the practice.
Representatives were invited to attend Monday’s meeting, but none were there, said Sarnia City Coun. Andy Bruziewicz, chairperson of the LAWSS board.
He said he hoped they were watching the video feed.
It’s unclear what happens next
Bruziewicz noted information is being collected by staff until June 2 for an eventual report to council.
“So that may outline the path towards the future a little bit,” he said.
Those interested can email comments via [email protected]
Several residents booked time to speak Monday on the issue. Most were opposed to fluoride in water
Municipalities like Windsor, Vancouver and Calgary have ended water fluoridation.
The evidence to end the practice needs to be stronger to make a move, Ranade said.
Evidence in support also needs to be stronger and updated, he said, suggesting Sarnia-Lambton should try to be involved in advancing that research.
Gravenhurst Registered Nutitional Consultant Practitioner says taxes shouldn't be spent on fluoridation
|Posted by ruth.bednar on June 1, 2017 at 10:55 AM||comments (0)|
Re: ‘Oral Health Sometimes Missed’ by Dr. Lisa Simon, Gravenhurst Banner, Thursday May 11.
I agree with Dr. Simon and would like to see Ontario’s Healthy Smiles program expand coverage for low income families, but I also feel coverage should include middle income families with no dental plan. Costly dental work can be unaffordable, leading to poor oral health
Your daily oral health regimen such as brushing, flossing etc. should also include a healthy diet rich in fresh, whole foods, avoiding refined sugars, refined baked goods, soda, fruit juices, ice cream, candy, etc. Oral health depends on vitamins and minerals that support and build strong teeth and bones, especially Vitamin D, K-2 and magnesium which are lacking in many diets.
Fluoride over-exposure from many sources such as toothpaste, fluoridated tap water, baby formulas, or any beverage/food made from fluoridated water, has led to an epidemic of fluoride damaged teeth called dental fluorosis. Skeletal fluorosis, as well, is increasing and we now have an exponential rate of hip fractures.
Communities that have been adding fluoride to the drinking water for decades, continue reporting high rates of dental disease. Recent scientific research has shown fluoridated tap water NOT ‘safe and effective’. Because of these studies, hundreds of Canadian towns have stopped adding HFSA (fluoride) to the community drinking water. Unfortunately, Gravenhurst and Bracebridge councillors decided to continue adding this industrial grade fluoride to the town’s drinking water. However, Huntsville and Baysville made the wise decision to discontinue community water fluoridation.
I suggest reallocating the tax dollars spent on harmful fluoridation chemicals to fund oral health programs for those in dire need of dental care. A win-win for everyone.
Ruth Bednar R.H.N., R.N.C.P., R.O.H.P.
|Posted by ruth.bednar on March 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM||comments (0)|
Hazardous Material Spill - Is Muskoka next?!
Last night a horrendous crash left death and injuries. This hazardous material unit emergency resulted in closure and evacuation on hwy 401 near Kingston.
Could Muskoka be next?
The toxic material spilled on the highway has been identified as fluorosilicic acid, aka fluoride, which is the same raw industrial co-contaminated chemical transported and added to the drinking water of Gravenhurst, Bracebridge, Muskoka Lakes (Bala, Port Carling), and Georgian Bay (Mactier). The sole purpose of adding this hazardous material, to the drinking water, is to ostensibly reduce dental decay.
A few years ago, Huntsville and Baysville (Lake of Bays) councilors, after much deliberation, exercised their due diligence, and voted to stop the addition of this toxic chemical to the drinking water, despite pressure from the Medical Officer of Health. Our neighboring towns, Barrie, Orillia and Parry Sound do not add fluorosilicic acid (fluoride) to the drinking water.
Thousands of scientists, toxicologists, doctors, dentists and other health professionals have spoken out about the proven health dangers of ingesting this unsafe chemical, especially since we are now overexposed to this toxin in food, beverages, dental products etc. However, some Muskoka towns have decided to continue on with this contentious government protected health policy, and still add fluorosilicic acid (fluoride) to the drinking water.
As the bees and polinators are slowly dying from government protected pesticides (neonicotinoids), our health is also being affected by a government protected toxin, fluorosilicic acid (fluoride), which should never have been initiated 60 years ago.
So, if we do not care about what this toxin is doing to our children's, grandchildren's and our health, at least we should start to care about what fluorosilicic acid is doing to our environment.
Our councillors, District and Local, are the final decision makers that can prevent another disaster like this happening to the environment, and also to our health.
Ruth Bednar R.H.N., R.N.C.P., R.O.H.P.
|Posted by ruth.bednar on October 15, 2016 at 3:00 PM||comments (0)|
By Roger Belgrave
Members of Peel Region’s Community Water Fluoridation Committee heard in no uncertain terms that the longstanding water treatment practice is a serious threat to general good health.
New Delhi researcher and professor Dr. A.K. Susheela spoke to the committee for about 30 minutes during a meeting Thursday.
The committee is re-examining the use of fluoride in the region’s drinking water and whether the practice holds real oral health benefits or poses a potential health risk.
As widely accepted as water fluoridation has been, there is a loud and passionate anti-fluoride lobby that has helped reignite serious debate at the highest levels of Peel Region government.
Findings by the committee will formulate a recommendation to regional council on the continued use of water fluoridation and a stated regional position on the presently accepted practice.
Susheela, executive director at India's Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation, was in town after speaking at an event organized by the opposition group Concerned Residents of Peel to End Fluoridation.
The organization’s chair, Mississauga resident Liesa Cianchino, convinced the committee to hear a presentation from Susheela, who is considered an informed anti-fluoride expert with global recognition.
Her fervent opposition to water fluoridation is in sharp contrast to positions held by Health Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and other health bodies, organizations, scientists and medical officials all over the world.
But her stance has ample support amongst the growing anti-fluoride lobby worldwide, including many parts of Canada.
Canada, Australia and Britain are among the last few corners of the globe still clinging to the idea water fluoridation has benefits, Susheela told members of the committee.
Armed with decades of scientific research, she appeared at the committee as an authority on the harmful health effects of fluoride.
“Fluoride is a deadly poison,” said Susheela, who also insisted squeezing toothpaste along the full length of your toothbrush bristles is too much.
The idea that fluoride is vital to preventing tooth decay is an outdated notion and contradicted by up-to-date scientific research, she suggested.
Fluoride is an abundant mineral naturally present in the environment.
Susheela, who also has spoken to the British parliament on the issue, said high levels of the mineral could cause tooth decay or debilitating ailments such as skeletal fluorosis.
Tooth decay is not a fluoride deficiency disorder, she argued, but a result of bad oral hygiene.
She explained ingesting fluoridated water, in addition to numerous other sources of exposure, essentially creates toxic levels in the human body.
“What matters most is what is circulating in your body,” according to Susheela.
Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards identify the maximum acceptable concentration of fluoride in drinking water as 1.5 mg per litre.
The optimal concentration of fluoride in drinking water to promote dental health is 0.7 mg per litre, according to Health Canada. This is the level Peel Region seeks to maintain.
Susheela insisted less is better when it comes to the water additive.
“Fluoride is a poison. That’s it. No fluoride is good,” she concluded.
The committee is hearing submissions on an invitation basis only and Mississauga Coun. Jim Tovey suggested hearing from an expert on the other side of the debate.
A number of presenters on opposite sides of the argument were invited to a closed-door workshop held by the committee last January.